Home > Failed To > Failed To Create Assembly Unable To Resolve Dependencies For Assembly

Failed To Create Assembly Unable To Resolve Dependencies For Assembly

Contents

Hide Permalink Karl Heinz Marbaise added a comment - 11/Mar/14 16:43 Unfortunately i have to say that one very important thing about your assumptions is incorrect: The senctence: using an assembly which is different to before. Me too. asked 2 years ago viewed 400 times active 2 years ago Blog Stack Overflow Gives Back 2016 Developers, Webmasters, and Ninjas: What’s in a Job Title? his comment is here

share|improve this answer answered Jun 10 '14 at 14:06 khmarbaise 47.9k777112 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign Where artifact three depends on artifact two. But any dependency resolution in the package phase happens against the repository, not against the reactor. SUCCESS [ 52.583 s] [INFO] byteman-install ....................................

Mvn Clean Install

See ASP.NET Ajax CDN Terms of Use – http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/CDN.ashx. ]]> Linked ApplicationsLoading… DashboardsProjectsIssuesAgile Help Online Help JIRA Agile Help I just left there the new distribution module. Apart from that i would ask why are you using version ranges in that case this can simply solved by using ${project.version} so no need for them. But I still don't understand why the moduleSet didn't work...

Or is it in > > > pluginManagement? > > > > > > > Well I don't really understand what do you mean with binding :) The > > assembly What are these boxes mounted inline on each of the 3 phase wires of a high voltage power line in Miami? Maybe it depends on the jdk8 version. Recent Msgs:general/2016-12/msg20066.htmlubuntu-bugs/2016-12/msg08081.htmlgeneral/2016-12/msg20074.htmlubuntu-bugs/2016-12/msg08098.htmllinux-kernel/2016-12/msg00168.htmlgeneral/2016-12/msg20077.htmlubuntu-bugs/2016-12/msg08133.htmlgeneral/2016-12/msg20238.htmlubuntu-bugs/2016-12/msg08140.htmlscm-fedora-commits/2016-12/msg07014.html Latest News Stories: Linux 4.0 Kernel Released Google Lets SMTP Certificate Expire Open Crypto Audit Passes TrueCrypt CIA 'tried to crack security of Apple devices' Xen Security Bug: Amazon,

Apart from that if you take a look at the error message: Unable to resolve dependencies for assembly 'foo': Failed to resolve dependencies for assembly: No versions are present in the Start by removing any assembly configuration from your parent, to keep things simple. SUCCESS [ 0.370 s] [INFO] byteman-submit ..................................... https://github.com/openhab/openhab2-addons/issues/70 I just > > left there the new distribution module.

Now each project in the reactor uses it's own version. When I change to the > distribution > > > folder and execute mvn assembly:single or mvn clean package I get this: > > > > > > [INFO] Reading assembly And I am not really shure it is right... > I > am trying now to make an assembly from the child project but the main > target > is preety CustomActionData for InstallerClass actions must be in format '/name1=value1 /name2=value2' Date must be between '1/1/1980' and '12/31/2099' Depth value must be zero or greater for file search Dialog module '

' is

Maven

SUCCESS [ 4.101 s] [INFO] byteman-sample ..................................... Issue Links blocks NMS-6573 Compile needs 5 to 6 runs to get 1.12/master compiled Resolved Activity All Comments Work Log History Activity Hide Permalink Seth Leger added a comment - 16/Oct/14 Mvn Clean Install Please, what is the right way to do so? With this variable ${project.parent.basedir} I can > get > > access on parent directory structure.

Recommended Version This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. this content It succeeds in finding the artifact two in the reactor. This is only an aggregator and not an multi-module build. does not exist only artifacts with versio 1.0.0 do exist.

Reload to refresh your session. We (yes, a group of us are now trying to figure this out) tried that right after I asked the question. You signed out in another tab or window. weblink SKIPPED[INFO] byteman-jboss-modules-plugin .......................

having artifacts one, two, three. The conclusion of this is that you neither have an aggregator nor an multi-module buld. OptionsSort By NameSort By DateAscendingDescendingAttachments assembly_bug_v2.tar.gz 11/Mar/14 11:49 0.8 kB fragfutter assembly_bug.tar.gz 23/Oct/13 09:52 0.8 kB fragfutter Activity Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order All Comments Work Log

Are you trying > to > > >> make > > >> > an > > >> > > assembly in the parent as well as in the child? > >

Very few of them involve anything as complex as what you are building. There isn't anything Byteman specific about it. 1 of 1 people found this helpful Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 13. So the question is what represent the "?" So in other words i see the error message as a correct one cause an artifact with the given version 0.. Or is it in >> > > pluginManagement? >> > > >> > >> > Well I don't really understand what do you mean with binding :) The >> > assembly

Are you trying to make > an > > assembly in the parent as well as in the child? > > > > I configure the descriptor in the parent because I've tried to run mvn install in byteman root directory but I've finished with javadoc plugin errors [2]. If you have further details please don't hesitate to reopen the issue. http://netfiscal.com/failed-to/failed-to-create-snk-unable-to-format-error-message.html I just > left there the new distribution module.

And artifact two depends on artifact one. And I am not really shure it is > > > >> right... > > > >> > I > > > >> > am trying now to make an assembly Re: Local Byteman installation (compilation) with Maven Ondra Chaloupka Jan 18, 2016 2:20 AM (in response to James Livingston) Ok, I see. Could anybody help me understand why this problem is happening?

With a dependeny chain: three -> two -> one Artifact three runs an assembly during package phase. It succeeds in finding the artifact two in the reactor. See for example MDEP-410 Show fragfutter added a comment - 12/Mar/14 04:23 In the first example each artifact has the same version.

© Copyright 2017 netfiscal.com. All rights reserved.